ABSTRACT
@#[摘 要] 目的：评价活化自体淋巴细胞过继性免疫治疗（adoptive immunotherapy，AIT）是否有助于改善原发性肝细胞癌的临床疗效。方法：选取2016年8月至2018年12月在中国人民解放军总医院第五医学中心确诊的64例原发性肝细胞癌患者，通过分层随机法分为免疫治疗组（n=29）和对照组（n=35）。免疫治疗组患者取60 ml外周血分离制备单个核细胞并在含OKT-3和IL-2的培养基中活化培养，回输前进行质控检测。免疫治疗组中的Ⅰ~Ⅲ期患者（n=14）于一线治疗后接受自体淋巴细胞输注（3个月内输注6次），Ⅳ期患者（n=15）仅接受自体淋巴细胞输注；对照组患者接受肝细胞癌相关的其他治疗。疗效评估的主要终点是2年无复发生存（relapse-free survival，RFS）率，次要终点为无进展生存期（progression-free survival，PFS）和总生存期（overall survival，OS）。结果：入组患者中位随访时间为2.8年（0.2~4.2年）。免疫治疗组29名患者共接受了167次（计划174次，完成率96%）预定淋巴细胞输注（平均每人次回输9.30×109个细胞，其中CD3+HLA-DR细胞约占63%），治疗期间未观察到3级或4级不良反应发生。与对照组相比，免疫治疗组患者2年RFS率显著升高（62.1% vs 22.9%，OR=0.181，95%CI：0.06~0.54，P=0.002），中位PFS（28 vs 8个月，P=0.004）和中位OS（38 vs 34个月，P=0.915）均显著延长。在Ⅰ~Ⅲ期患者中，免疫治疗组（n=14）2年RFS率较对照组（n=18）显著升高（92.9% vs 33.3%，OR=0.38，95%CI：0.004~0.368，P=0.005），中位PFS明显延长（38 vs 14.5个月，P=0.005），而两组OS间无显著差异；Ⅳ期患者两组间PFS（P=0.077）及OS（P=0.994）均未见显著差异。结论：活化自体淋巴细胞AIT为安全可行的肝细胞癌辅助性治疗方法，可提高Ⅰ~Ⅲ期肝细胞癌一线治疗后RFS率、延长患者RFS时间，而对进展期肝细胞癌患者的PFS和OS无明显影响。
ABSTRACT
@# Objective: To evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and follow-up of dendritic cell (DC) vaccines in combination with cytokine-induced killer cell (CIK) treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods: From January 2011 to December 2013, 29 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (pathologically confirmed as renal clear cell carcinoma) were treated by DC vaccines-CIK at the Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital. The 29 patients included 24 male and 5 female, with a median age of 57(32-81) years old. Mature DC vaccine was obtained by gene transfection technology and CIK cells were obtained by i n v i t r o culture; and DC vaccine-CIK was infused back to patients through lymphatic drainage area and vein by each course. Twelve patients received first line treatment, 6 patients received second line treatment after the disease progression by targeted drug therapy or cytokine therapy, and 11 patients received third-linetreatment or above. The long-term clinical efficacy and overall survival rate were evaluated. Results: The median follow-up time was 5 (1-7) years. Treatment cycle was over 2 (2-23) cycles. One case (3.4%) achieved complete remission, 9 cases (31%) achieved partial responses, 13 cases (44.8%) demonstrated stable disease over 3 months and 6 patients (20.7%) developed progressive disease. The objective response rate was 34.4%,and the disease control rate was 79.2%. Stable disease for more than one year realized in 19 cases (65.5%). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 93.1% (27/29), 65.5% (20/29) and 51.7% (15 / 29), respectively. Neither the median progression-free survival (PFS) nor the median survival time was achieved. No adverse reactions above grade 3 were observed during treatment. Conclusion: DC vaccines-CIK therapy for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma is affirmative; it achieved good disease control and long-term survival with controllable safety, and prolonged the survival time for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients.